A school where a boy was attacked with a hammer failed to recognise a
series of racist incidents prior to the assault, a serious case review
has found
.
Henry Webster, then 15, suffered three skull fractures in the attack by a group of Asian youths in 2007.
His mother Liz Webster said the review showed the school was at fault.
Mr Webster, now 18, was punched, kicked and hit with a claw hammer at Ridgeway School, in Wroughton, near Swindon. Mrs Webster said: “This review has confirmed our belief that the
Ridgeway School was responsible for the horrific, devastating assault
on our son which has left him with permanent injuries.
“The criticism of the local authority is tantamount to a whitewash as it is so minimal and limited.”
Before the attack, Mr Webster had agreed to fight a boy “one on one”
due to peer pressure and to stop harassment he thought he and his
friends were experiencing. He has returned to part-time education, but
still suffers from short-term memory loss. The report summary, published by the Swindon Local Safeguarding
Children Board, said: “The school, although it knew in advance, did not
prepare for the arrival of a significant number of British Asian
students in 2005.”more
In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell --
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Texas: ATS Labels Anti-Traffic Camera Initiatives Racist
Traffic camera firm invokes 1965 civil rights bill to stop votes in Baytown and Houston, Texas that would ban red light cameras.
The citizen-led groups that want the public to decide the future of red light cameras are racist, according to lawsuits filed by American Traffic Solutions (ATS) in a pair of Texas cities. The Arizona-based photo enforcement firm filed in a state court in Baytown on Thursday and then an ATS-funded front group filed an identical case in a federal court in Houston on Friday. Residents in both cities signed petitions placing a ban on automated ticketing machines onto the November 2 ballot, but ATS cites the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 as a reason to block these votes.
“Because the camouflaged referendum has been improperly placed on the ballot, a potential for racial discrimination exists,” Houston lawyer Andy Taylor wrote on behalf of ATS. “More specifically, minority voters may lose their ability to elect candidates of their choice in local, statewide and federal offices.”
The ATS claim may come as a surprise to the diverse groups behind anti-camera petition efforts elsewhere in the country. In East Cleveland, Ohio the group Black on Black Crime led the effort to gather signatures for a referendum
. In Cincinnati, the anti-camera coalition
included the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People (NAACP) and the Green Party. The American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) has also battled cameras in Iowa
and Rhode Island
. Baytown initiative sponsor Byron Schirmbeck
suggested the traffic camera industry was disguising its true aim with the racism charge.
The Chronicle has no evidence to support this claim first developed by ATS hired gun Jim McGrath. more
The citizen-led groups that want the public to decide the future of red light cameras are racist, according to lawsuits filed by American Traffic Solutions (ATS) in a pair of Texas cities. The Arizona-based photo enforcement firm filed in a state court in Baytown on Thursday and then an ATS-funded front group filed an identical case in a federal court in Houston on Friday. Residents in both cities signed petitions placing a ban on automated ticketing machines onto the November 2 ballot, but ATS cites the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 as a reason to block these votes.
“Because the camouflaged referendum has been improperly placed on the ballot, a potential for racial discrimination exists,” Houston lawyer Andy Taylor wrote on behalf of ATS. “More specifically, minority voters may lose their ability to elect candidates of their choice in local, statewide and federal offices.”
The ATS claim may come as a surprise to the diverse groups behind anti-camera petition efforts elsewhere in the country. In East Cleveland, Ohio the group Black on Black Crime led the effort to gather signatures for a referendum
The Chronicle has no evidence to support this claim first developed by ATS hired gun Jim McGrath. more
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Jesse Got His Cadillac Escalade Rims Stripped while Promoting Green Jobs in Motor City
When the Rev. Jesse Jackson led a rally for “green jobs” in Detroit,
he arrived in the Motor City in a massive Cadillac SUV. But his exit
from the Motor City was a lot more environmentally friendly — thanks to
some car thieves.
The robbers stole the civil rights activist’s rented 2009 Escalade SUV on Monday. He was in Detroit for Saturday’s Jobs, Justice and Peace Rally in downtown Detroit. Police found the car later that day, stripped of its wheels but otherwise intact, WXYZ reported
.
Jackson, who led the march along with United Auto Workers President Bob King, said there was nothing contradictory about renting an SUV and promoting green jobs.
“We were promoting a car manufacturer and representing the American worker, whatever car they chose,” Jackson said. “My wife has a Smart Car, but for the purposes that we were traveling, the car was — it fit the bill.”
One Detroit columnist disagreed. “Add Jesse to the Al Gore-Tom Friedman-Barack Obama
School of Environmental Hypocrisy,” Detroit News columnist Henry Payne wrote
.
“While preaching to Americans that they need to cram their families
into hybrid Priuses to go shopping for compact fluorescent light bulbs
to save the planet, they themselves continue to live large.”more
The robbers stole the civil rights activist’s rented 2009 Escalade SUV on Monday. He was in Detroit for Saturday’s Jobs, Justice and Peace Rally in downtown Detroit. Police found the car later that day, stripped of its wheels but otherwise intact, WXYZ reported
Jackson, who led the march along with United Auto Workers President Bob King, said there was nothing contradictory about renting an SUV and promoting green jobs.
“We were promoting a car manufacturer and representing the American worker, whatever car they chose,” Jackson said. “My wife has a Smart Car, but for the purposes that we were traveling, the car was — it fit the bill.”
One Detroit columnist disagreed. “Add Jesse to the Al Gore-Tom Friedman-Barack Obama
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Judge allows KKK suit against Missouri to proceed
A federal judge in St. Louis has rejected a state request to dismiss the lawsuit filed by a Ku Klux Klan group.
Frank Ancona, imperial wizard of the Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, is seeking to rent a pavilion at the Fort Davidson Historic Site in southeast Missouri.
The group filed a lawsuit as it sought to use the site for an April 14 gathering. The KKK group was unable to meet the insurance requirements imposed by the Department of Natural Resources and held the picnic on private property.
Ancona alleges that the requirements violated his right to free speech.more at stltoday
'Don't Tread On Me' Almost As Symbolic As The Flag Of The USA
I know and understand it is going to take a whole lot more then waving this flag for
things to really be done and I also wanted to mention that I put this up I guess in comparison of how all the
illegals are coming to the united states and the government hasn’t
really done anything about it and I suppose that flying this flag is one
way they are seeing an impact of real battle fought.
'It had been the policy of Britain to send convicted criminals to
America, so Franklin suggested that they thank the British by sending
rattlesnakes to England.[1]‘’
The words from Gadsden's flag are some of the most patriotic words to this country as the founding of the United States of America, as the flag of the United States, now it seems it is offending some people across the country.
Why is that, because the 'Tea Party' showing that they are fed up and feel violated? Or is it due to the treatment/mis-treatment by Elected officials in the US Government, who just won't or don't listen? I know, maybe because of the way US citizens are made to feel second class and like criminals in their own country?
'The use of the timber rattlesnake as a symbol of the American colonies can be traced back to the publications of Benjamin Franklin. In 1751, he made the first reference to the rattlesnake in a satirical commentary published in his Pennsylvania Gazette. It had been the policy of Britain to send convicted criminals to America, so Franklin suggested that they thank the British by sending rattlesnakes to England.[1]'
Let's hope the ACLU is willing to represent all that decide to fly this flag and are saying 'No More' and 'We're not going to take it anymore'
An Arizona man is in trouble with his homeowners' association over flying the Gadsden flag, which features a coiled rattlesnake and the words "Don't Tread on Me." The flag has been adopted by members of the tea party movement for its association with the American Revolution,
Arizona has a state statute that allows Arizonans to fly "the Stars and Stripes, the state flag, flags representing Indian nations as well as the official flags of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard," the Times reports.'Andy' McDonel's homeowners' association is strictly interpreting that law to ban the flying of any other flags, including the Gadsden. The American Civil Liberties Union is defending McDonel, saying the homeowners' group is taking too strict a view of the statute and restricting McDonel's right to free speech.McDonel isn't the only person to run into a dispute over the historic flag.
Eric Smith of Thornton, Colo., said he and his neighbor were sent a letter by their homeowners' association that said "Tea Party flags are not permitted. Please Remove." They were threatened with a $100-a-month fine for flying the Gadsden flag. Colorado has a statue similar to Arizona's that specifies which flags are allowed to be flown. The homeowners' association eventually reversed its demand, saying his flag fell into the category of "political signs" instead of flags and was thus allowed.
In March, House Republicans created a stir amid the hard-fought vote on health care reform by grabbing a Gadsden flag from the anti-reform crowd assembled outside the Capitol and brandishing it from within the building.
more
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Fake Hate Crimes: An Islamist Weapon
Over the recent Fourth of July weekend, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR
[1]) interviewed [2] attendees of the 47th annual Islamic Society of North America (ISNA
[3])
convention about their experiences in dealing with “Islamophobia.”
Shortly afterwards, on July 6, CAIR called on the FBI to investigate an act of arson
[4]
at a Georgia mosque, saying that hate crimes were increasing because of
a “vocal minority in our society promoting anti-Muslim bigotry.” The
Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA
[5]) referred
[6] to it as one of the “incidents of Islamophobia [that] are on the rise in this country.” However, police later arrested
[7] a Muslim suspect.
As Daniel Pipes has documented
[8] for years
[9],
Islamist organizations in the West are quick to label crimes as
anti-Muslim hate crimes as part of their effort to make Muslims feel under attack
[10] and to paint themselves as Muslims’ protectors. For example, immediately following the Fort Hood shooting
[11], CAIR asked
[12]
Muslims to respond by donating to it. “We need financial help to meet
these crises and push back against those who seek to score political
points off the Muslim community in the wake of the Fort Hood tragedy,”
the fundraising pitch read. To no one’s surprise, an anti-Muslim
backlash did not ensue
[13].
Cutting through the propaganda requires understanding the ways in which crimes are misrepresented as hate crimes — and why. There are two main culprits to consider: Muslims who stage fake hate crimes and Islamist organizations that seek to exploit them.
Why would anyone fabricate a hate crime against himself or his mosque? History indicates a pair of common motives.MORE
As Daniel Pipes has documented
Cutting through the propaganda requires understanding the ways in which crimes are misrepresented as hate crimes — and why. There are two main culprits to consider: Muslims who stage fake hate crimes and Islamist organizations that seek to exploit them.
Why would anyone fabricate a hate crime against himself or his mosque? History indicates a pair of common motives.MORE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The Jews do not have a monopoly on Genocide, Eugenic Cleansing/holocaust, extermination or annihilation of their Race or Religion. When ...
-
Under Satan's Sun by Bloody Hammers