BIG HUGE Difference in what a FLASH MOB is don't Confuse the two

Mmmmm, got to love screaming first thing in the morning! :-o like about 8ish am  Thats exactly what I did when I heard on 610AM this morning, when they where talking about the Flash Mobs* attacks as not being a racial thing...... HFS  They need to come up with a new name to besides flash mobs, A flash mob are those stupid zombie, dance things in a public place, not when mobs of thugs attack innocent white people!  I'm talking about the sheeple who are being misled by the MSM calling these attacks Black Flash Mobs. (most sheeple would think OH it's a M.J. 'Thriller' kind of thing, when that is furthest from the truth.

response I received earlier about this:   Honestly I havent heard much else about it. They target whites down in that area because they know the whites over there wont fight back, not that most whites will anyway but I mean thats higher class yuppies in those areas mostly who depend on the cops to save them. The nigs come from over in the projects and know they have easy targets.
I assumed you were talking the recent attacks in Chicago lol...either way I dont feel bad for any whites who dont fight back. You deserve what you permit


My reply to the above:
I'm talking about the attacks everywhere across the USA , there might just be one of those needless savage attacks on my mother, who most certainly doesn't deserve that and will fight back, but she shouldn't have to due to the injustice system around here. Trust me and we certainly aren't upper crust yuppies. The main reason I wrote what I did was I hate  how they call them flash mobs bc the sheeple think they are those gay ass dance things when innocent and possibly even aware people are being hurt.  It might be your mother, grandmother or sister, daughter.  I mean be honest not everyone in the world is a prize fighter or black belt.  Especially when attacked by a tribe of blacks that are out to hurt someone!

Carter Strange was the victim of a near fatal attack by eight young black males in Columbia, SC

MSM admits covering up Black Crimes towards Whites

I know this is from the LA Riots, that took place almost a 2 decades ago but this is insane, all because they wanted to hurt a 'White Person' Considered a Riot, but I see the same thing.

Someone please tell me again how and why this is a United $tates Problem?

How U.S. Budget Cuts Prolong Global Slavery

Three days before the U.S. congressional elections last fall, Hillary Clinton stood halfway around the world from Washington, pledging to young victims of human trafficking at Cambodia’s Siem Reap Center that they would continue to enjoy the support of the U.S. State Department, which then provided some $336,000 to the shelter. The acclaimed center, situated near the magnificent temples of Angkor Wat, was an oasis of peace for some 50 survivors who, before they were rescued or escaped, had endured slavery in brothels, where they were forced to have sex with as many as 30 men a day. At the shelter, they received counseling, studied hairdressing, learned to sew, and otherwise worked to rebuild their lives and reclaim their humanity. In the evenings, they did aerobics together.

On Monday afternoon, some eight months after that visit, as she unveiled the State Department’s 11th annual Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report to a packed room in the department’s ornate Benjamin Franklin Room, Clinton only hinted that the result of the congressional elections had left in doubt the long-term value of her pledge to the survivors. “Even in these tight economic times, we need to find ways to do better,” Clinton told the overflowing crowd.(Watch “Nepal: Escaped from the Sex Trade, Unable to Go Home.”)

Clinton’s confidence belied the fact that in April, Congress slashed the grant-making capacity of the State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons. When the Republicans won the House last November, the office’s $21.2 million annual budget to fight the war on slavery was already microscopic. At the time, it was barely equal to the U.S. government’s daily budget to fight the war on drugs. For fiscal year 2012, Congress sliced away nearly a quarter of those antislavery funds, as part of its broader $8 billion State Department budget cuts.

For Mark Lagon, a former Republican staffer on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who headed the TIP office during the Bush Administration’s second term, the budget cuts are “a sign that all programs are evenly hit, even those with broad nonpartisan support.” But Lagon was troubled that shoestring yet lifesaving overseas antislavery programs would feel those cuts most dearly. “We need to spend 10 times as much on fighting human trafficking and ending slavery,” said Lagon, “and it would still be a bargain even at that price.”

In this year’s trafficking report, the constraints on the TIP office are not limited to the budget. Annually, the report ranks countries based on how well they fought slavery in the previous year. Countries demonstrating the most effective antitrafficking efforts are placed in Tier 1; recalcitrant nations are placed in Tier 3, where they could face nontrade sanctions, including prohibitions on development assistance. While the 2011 report ranks most of the 184 countries in the middle, the State Department ranked 42 nations just above those threatened with sanctions, on the watch list of Tier 2. Antislavery activists claim that ranking a country in the watch list for some consecutive years amounts to a cop-out. In congressional testimony last year, Holly Burkhalter, vice president for government relations at the International Justice Mission, decried the misuse of the list as a “parking lot for U.S. allies that actually belonged in Tier 3.”(Healthland: “State Dept. Report Targets Human Trafficking in the U.S.”)

Three years ago, when Congress reauthorized the 2000 Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the law that created the TIP office, it moved to clear out the “parking lot.” The new law mandated that any country that had been on the watch list for two consecutive years would be downgraded to Tier 3, unless that country presented a written plan and a demonstrated capacity to improve its slavery record. This year, all but five of the 19 “parking lot” occupants avoided the automatic downgrade. Of those five that were dropped under the law, Libya and Venezuela join Cuba, North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe and other Tier 3 countries already facing U.S. sanctions. more:

When the lifeboat is overloaded

Our nation’s first immigration law in 1882 specified that nobody would be allowed into our country if that individual expected a free ride. Anybody expecting to live off public money was turned away. Not anymore. The United States has become a deluxe retirement home for the elderly of other countries.  Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation has discoveredthat most of the one million non-citizens in the United States are living off you.

Forty-five percent of all elderly immigrants in California are getting cash from you. Among Russian immigrants, 66 percent are taking your money.At today’s rate of immigration, there will be 3 million noncitizen immigrants costing you — over the next ten years —$328 billion. Publications that are widely distributed among immigrants in all languages tell them how to get your money.

Homegrown Americans expect parents to provide for their own children, yet immigrant families can bring immigrant elderly to the United States and expect taxpayers to support them.The triage law of the sea prescribes a legal limit for thenumber of people in each lifeboat. Any others seeking to fight their way aboard must be refused — in any way necessary — in order to keep the lifeboat afloat.

The triage law of the sea prescribes a legal limit for thenumber of people in each lifeboat. Any others seeking tofight their way aboard must be refused — in any waynecessary — in order to keep the lifeboat afloat.Economics Professor George Borjas computes the costof jobs lost to foreign-born workers to be $133 billion a year.Dr. Donald Huddle of Rice University projects the netcost of legal immigration will exceed $400 billion in the nextdecade. And this figure is in excess of any taxes thatemployed immigrants might pay.Those who contend that mass immigration is aneconomic asset do not compute all the costs of services rendered free to immigrants. Also, they omit the children of immigrants from their fiscal analyses.  A Roper Poll reveals that 54 percent of Americans want annual immigration to be less than 100,000. But each year— as more immigrants, legal and other, arrive — thehomegrown Americans in the lifeboat will be further outnumbered, out-shouted and overwhelmed.It seems inhospitable — cruel — to turn others away. But when our own Ship of State is sinking in a sea of red ink, the alternative to triage is Titanic.

— Paul Harvey, April 9, 1996.By permission of Paul Harvey and Creators Syndicate.

Confederate sub (The H.L. Hunley) upright for first time since 1864

— The first submarine in history to sink an enemy warship is upright for the first time in almost 150 years, revealing a side of its hull not seen since it sank off the South Carolina coast during the Civil War.

Workers at a conservation lab finished the painstaking, two-day job of rotating the hand-cranked H.L. Hunley upright late Thursday.

The Hunley was resting on its side at a 45-degree angle on the bottom of the Atlantic when it was raised in August 2000 and scientists had kept it in slings in that position in the lab for the past 11 years.

But they needed to turn it upright to continue with the job of conservation.

Scientists hope the hidden side of the sub will provide clues as to why the Hunley sank with its eight-member crew in February, 1864, after sending the Union blockade ship Houstonic to the bottom.

While there was no immediate clue from a first look at the hidden hull but “we are seeing some tantalizing clues on that side,” Hunleyarchaeologist Maria Jacobsen said Friday.

Scientists knew there were large hull breaches on the starboard side that remained out of view all these years. Jacobsen said the area around the holes is smooth, as the sediment that has hardened on the hull was blasted away. It’s not clear whether the breaches are manmade — caused by an explosion or the like — or simply caused by nature.

She said it likely could have been scoured away by water and tides.

“We may be dealing with nature here. How can these massive hull breaches occur?” she asked.

“Nothing jumps out at me” from seeing the starboard side, said state Sen. Glenn McConnell, the chairman of the South Carolina Hunley Commission. “But we will be examining it for any clue that might be there to help us solve the mystery.”

There are various theories why the sub sank. It could have been damaged by fire from the Housatonic or the sub’s crew was knocked out by the concussion from the blast that sank that ship. Or it could have been damaged by another Union vessel rescuing the Housatonic.

Studies show the crew died of a lack of oxygen and didn’t drown.more

The History

The Hunley, This sub appears to have some things in common with the U-boats of W.W.I, 50 years later.

A group of private citizens in New Orleans, including James McClintock, Baxter Watson, and Horace Hunley, got together to finance and design a submersible torpedo boat. Their first prototype, Pioneer, was completed, but had to be scuttled in Lake Pontchartrain soon after due to the fall of the city in 1862. The engineers fled to Mobile where they built a second prototype, American Diver. Mclintock experimented with different motive methods, including steam and battery power. However, in the end they went with a hand cranked drive. On its first time out, it was swamped and lost while under tow outside of Mobile Bay. Its location remains a mystery..

Months later, with additional investors and $15,000 ($300,000 today), they built their third submarine, which would later become known as the Hunley. It was hand cranked by a crew of 8, and used hand pumped ballast tanks, fore and aft, to submerge and surface. Soon, the Hunley was tested and demonstrated a successful attack against a dummy target using a towed contact torpedo. The military approved its use and put the Hunley on a train to Charleston.

Door To Door Atheists Bother Mormons

EMBED-Door To Door Atheists Bother Mormons - Watch more free videos

Australian filmmaker John Safran is so fed up with mormons ringing his doorbell early in the morning that he flies to Salt Lake City Utah and tries to convert Mormons to atheism. Needless to say, the locals were not pleased.

Muslim woman sues Abercrombie & Fitch over hijab

) — A former stockroom worker for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. sued the clothing retailer in federal court Monday, saying she was illegally fired after refusing to remove herMuslim headscarf while on the job.

Hani Khan, a former stockroom worker for Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

Hani Khan said a manager at the company’s Hollister Co. store at the Hillsdale Mall in San Mateo hired her while she was wearing her hijab. The manager said it was OK to wear it as long as it was in company colors, Khan said.

Four months later, the 20-year-old says a district manager andhuman resources manager asked if she could remove the hijab while working, and she was suspended and then fired for refusing to do so.

It’s the latest employment discrimination charge against the company’s so-called “look policy,” which critics say means images of mostly white, young, athletic-looking people. The New Albany, Ohio-based company has said it does not tolerate discrimination.

Diversity and Inclusion

Since the start of the initiative, we have seen marked improvement in the diversity of our in-store staff. We continue to work at this and other aspects of our initiative, but here are a few key facts as of April 30th, 2010 that we are proud of.

• Our in-store workforce, as a whole is 50.22% people of color
• Our in-store models are 48.44% people of color
• Our in-store managers-in-training are 41.04% people of color

Still, Abercrombie has been the target of numerous discrimination lawsuits, including a federal class action brought by black, Hispanic and Asian employees and job applicants that was settled for $40 million in 2004. The company admitted no wrongdoing, though it was forced to implement new programs and policies to increase diversity.

“Growing up in this country where the Bill of Rights guaranteesfreedom of religion, I felt let down,” Khan, now a college student studying political science, said at a news conference. “This case is about principles, the right to be able to express your religion freely and be able to work in this country.”

Abercrombie defended its record in a comment provided to The Associated Press, saying diversity in its stores “far exceeds the diversity in the population of the United States.”

“We comply with the law regarding reasonable religious accommodation, and we will continue to do so,” said Rocky Robbins, the company’s general counsel. “We are confident that when this matter is tried, a jury will find that we have fully complied with the law.”

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco comes after the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled in September that Khan was fired illegally. Khan’s lawsuit was filed in conjunction with the EEOC’s lawsuit.

It is not the first time the company has been charged with discriminating against Muslim women over the wearing of a hijab.

In 2009, Samantha Elauf, who was 17 at the time, filed a federal lawsuit in Oklahoma, alleging the company rejected her for a job because she was wearing a hijab. That case is still ongoing.more

thank you battleskin88