Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Seriously, how many of you are now scared for life after having a ‘Fairy Tale’ read to you as a child?


Fairytales too scary for modern children, say parents

Traditional fairytales are being ditched by parents because they are too scary for their young children, a study found.

Research revealed one in five parents has scrapped old classics such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarves and Rapunzel in favour of more modern books.
One third of parents said their children have been left in tears after hearing the gruesome details of Little Red Riding Hood.
And nearly half of mothers and fathers refuse to read Rumplestiltskin to their kids as the themes of the story are kidnapping and execution.
And 52 per cent of the parents said Cinderella didn’t send a good message to their children as it portrays a young woman doing housework all day.
Steve Hornsey, General Manager, Watch, said: ”Bedtime stories are supposed to soothe children and send them off to sleep soundly.
Tfirst series of Dynamo: Magician Impossible was the highest-rating new Pay TV series of 2011 and a breakout hit for Watch, delivering huge TV ratings peaking at 1.9m viewers, but also generating a huge amount of Twitter and Facebook traffic. Influential Twitter fans including Stephen Fry and Matt Lucas helped to secure Dynamo: Magician Impossible over 52,000 mentions on Twitter and almost 250,000 Facebook fans.
This year UKTV has signed an exclusive talent deal with Dynamo for Watch. Phil McIntrye Television and Inner Circle Films will co-produce the two 4 x60’series, which has been commissioned by Commissioning Editor, Richard Watsham and Director of Commissioning, Jane Rogerson, and ordered by Watch’s General Manager, Steve Hornsey.


”But as we see in GRIMM, fairytales can be dark and dramatic tales so it’s understandable that parents worry about reading them to young children.”
”As adults we can see the innocence in fairytales, but a five year old with an over active imagination could take things too literally.
”Despite the dark nature of classic fairytales, as we see in GRIMM, good will triumph over evil and there is always a moral to the story.”
The study also found two thirds of mums and dads try to avoid stories which might give their children nightmares.
However half of parents said traditional tales are more likely to have a strong moral message than a lot of modern kids’ books, such as The Gruffalo, The Hungary Caterpillar and the Mr Men books.
1. Hansel and Gretel – Details two kids abandoned in the forest and likely to scare young children
2. Jack and the Beanstalk – Deemed too ‘unrealistic’.
3. Gingerbread Man – Would be uncomfortable explaining gingerbread man gets eaten by a fox
4. Little Red Riding Hood – Deemed unsuitable by parents who have to explain a young girl’s grandmother has been eaten by a wolf.
5. Snow White and the Seven Dwarves – the term dwarves was found to be inappropriate.
What and we didn’t have imaginations when we where kids….WTH. Get your kids off all those BS meds and you can explain things differently if your kid has a hang up with the term ‘dwarves’ or what parents don’t have any imagination themselves?
On the Jack and the Beanstock thing….hell I thought it was unrealistic too, but guess what I got over it as I’m sure everyone else has to.
Yeah like TV, cartoons, and stories are so much better now…oh yeah I forgot a lot of parent’s let their little little kids watch inappropriate stuff all the time. How else would a little 5 year old girl I overheard talk and know about sucking a boys dick, other then seeing it on TV or getting molested? and your worried about Cinderella and the fact that she has to clean? I smell a total jew rat behind this way of thinking

The drum beat of a predestined war


Israel’s foreign minister is in Washington. There’s a lot to talk about.
Politicians and diplomats can be surprisingly coy about asking direct questions, even in private. So, “are you going to plunge us into a war in an election year?” may remain unspoken.
The drumbeat of war has grown louder in the past few days.
The Washington Post reported that US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta believes Israel could attack Iran as early as this spring.
Mr Panetta did not deny the story.
This was reinforced by a fascinating and incredibly detailed articleby the Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman.
“After speaking with many senior Israeli leaders and chiefs of the military and the intelligence, I have come to believe that Israel will indeed strike Iran in 2012,” Mr Bergman concludes.
This is the argument: there is less than a year to stop Iran moving into “the immunity zone”.more from bbc    thank you battleskin88

Target Iran – Air Strikes

The German magazine Der Spiegel reported in October 2004 that Israel had completed plans for a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Der Spiegel reported that a special unit of the Mossad had received order in July 2004 to prepare a detailed plan, which had been delivered to the Israeli Air Force. The source for the report, an IAF pilot, said the plan to take out Iran’s nuclear sites was “complex, yet manageable.” Israel’s plan assumes that Iran has six nuclear sites, all of which would be attacked simultaneously.
It would be difficult for Israel to strike at Iran without American knowledge, since the mission would have to be flown through American [formerly Iraqi] air space. Even if the United States did not actively participate with operations inside Iranian air space, the US would be a passive participant by virtue of allowing Israeli aircraft unhindered passage. In the eyes of the world, it would generally appear to be a joint US-Israeli enterprise, any denials notwithstanding. Indeed, it is quite probable that Iran would not be able to readily determine the ultimate origins of the strike, given Iran’s relatively modest air defense capabilities. Thus, even if the strike were entirely of American origin, Israel would be implicated. When asked in August 2004 about Israeli threats to attack Iran, Bush’s national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, declined to say whether the United States would support such action by Israel.From globalsecurity.org
 Short URL: http://www.newsnet14.com/?p=95512

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

The Re-Education of German Prisoners of War


LIFE Mar 18, 1946

Covers of books series “Neue Welt”, i.e. new world with anti-nazi literature, edited by U.S. Army Special Projects Division for German POW in cooperation with the Berman-Fischer publishing house, 1944. (German Resistance Memorial Center, Berlin)
The example of Camp Fort Devens, Massachusetts  
copyright by Norbert Haase
          In a way American POW camps represented a microcosm of the German society in the “Third Reich”. According to the time of capture – either on the Northern African theater or at the Battle of the Bulge the soldiers had different attitudes towards the outcome of the war, a different extent of nationalism and loyalty to Hitler and his regime. Ardent nationalist officers and nazi NCOs attempted to establish, what repatriants later called a “Feldwebeldiktatur”, i.e. sergeant dictatorship, a system of rigid discipline and thought control like in Nazi Germany. As a result such circumstances lead to violent confrontations between Nazi and Anti-nazi prisoners and even to murder. American camp personnel frequently acted with too much tolerance, sometimes even encouragement towards this German camp regime because they were mainly interested in military order and discipline and they distrusted radical leftist prisoners

German POWs Schooled in the Ways of Democracy

from The American Magazine, 1946
Early in 1944 the U.S. Army’s Special Projects Division of the Office of the Provost Marshal General was established in order to take on the enormous task of re-educating 360,000 German prisoners of war. Months before the Allies had landed in France it was clear to them that the Germans would soon be blitzkrieging back to the Fatherland and in order to make smooth the process of rebuilding that nation, a few Germans would be needed who understood the virtues of a republican form of government. In order to properly see the job through, two schools were built at Fort Getty, Rhode Island and Fort Eustis, Virginia.
This article was written by Robert Lowe Kunzig (1918 – 1982) 

Camp Patrick Henry, the German POW Camp, morphed into Patrick Henry Field, now Newport News Williamsburg International Airport.
Another German POW Camp was located at the continuation of the James River Bridgecrossover from Virginia Avenue to Jefferson Avenue, below the bridge. More still were housed at Fort Eustis.
The Italian POW camp was on the Old Casino Grounds which was on the hill behind theVictory Arch.
Camp Hill, also used for the Italian POWs, was bounded to the south by the temporary wooden railroad overpass at 58th Street, the James River Bridge/Military Highway railroad overpass to the north, Jefferson Avenue to the east, and the railroad yards to the west.
Ron Robin. The Barbed Wire College: Reeducating German POWs in the United States during World War II.  Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Ron Robin, an historian from the University of Haifa, aimed originally in this project to evaluate the success of the American reeducation program for German POWs held in the United States during and after the Second World War. Yet the “manifestly ineffectual” methods employed by the Americans pushed the study in another direction. Rather than devoting an “entire book to damning American reeducation officials for being presumptuous or misleading,”
Share With Friends:

Research Involving Prisoners [USA 1976]



Research Involving Prisoners

Monday, February 13, 2012

New York Democratic Rep. Eric Massa Wants to Ban Download Caps


Time Warner Cable plans to test its controversial, new scheme to have users pay by the gigabyte in Rochester, New York, but the area’s freshman congressman calls usage caps greedy and plans to introduce legislation to stop it.
New York Democratic Rep. Eric Massa called TWC’s proposal to switch its 8.4 million cable broadband customers to metered internet billing an "outrageous plan to tax the American people."
Massa, a longtime blogger at the liberal site DailyKos, says he will be joined by a "legion of activists" and called the fight against usage caps a "national issue of generational consequences." However, Massa’s fight will not get far without support from powerful House members,including Virginia Democrat Rick Boucher who now controls a key committee on telecoms and the internet.
Critics say usage caps will cost users more and hurt innovation on the net — especially in new video services, as subscribers begin to calorie-count their internet usage.
TWC’s new tiered pricing structure for its Roadrunner internet service starts at $15 for a plan that allows 1 GB a month with an overage charge of $2 per GB. (A GB of data equals about three hours of online video from Hulu.com and about half of a rented standard definition movie.) 
"That $146 million is a small part of the variable costs," Dudley said. "Demands placed on network are a factor, such as ‘Do we have to split a node to accommodate heavy use?’ Those are capital costs that are directly related to use."
TWC first tested the plans in Beaumont, Texas, and is now collecting usage data in Rochester, New York and the Texas cities San Antonio ,Austin, in preparation for an expanded metered billing test later this summer.
Nearly all U.S. residential broadband providers sell their services based on bandwidth speeds, with no mention of a usage cap. Experts say that’s in part because there’s little data for the companies to base their pricing on, and because if one company offers unlimited data, the others do as well, at least in markets where there is broadband competition. Broadband usage continues to grow, most recently thanks to an explosion in online video services, but the cost of moving those bits also continues to fall.
Time Warner isn’t alone in its campaign to crack down on heavy net users. AT&T announced last November that it would test monthly bandwidth caps and overage fees. Comcast installed a 250-GB cap last
August; Canada’s Rogers enforces a 60 GB limit; and New York-based DSL
provider Frontier has a miserly 5-GB limit (though public pressure forced the company not to enforce it)