Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Nazi Role in 1933 Reichstag Fire Should Be Probed, Pau Says

The vice president of Germany’s lower house of parliament, Petra Pau, called for a review into the 1933 fire that destroyed the Reichstag in Berlin which helped clear the way for the Nazi rise to power.

The Reichstag Fire, 1933

“This is a God-given signal!”
D. Sefton Delmar was a reporter for the London Daily Express who witnessed the fire. We join his account as Hitler exclaims his reaction to the inferno:
“‘This is a God-given signal! If this fire, as I believe, turns out to be the handiwork of Communists, then there is nothing that shall stop us now crushing out this murder pest with an iron fist.’
Adolf Hitler, Fascist Chancellor of Germany, made this dramatic declaration in my presence tonight in the hall of the burning Reichstag building.
This eyewitness account appeared in: Delmar, D. Sefton, London Daily Express, 2/28/33, reprinted in: Lewis, Jon E. The Mammoth Book of EyeWitness History, 2000 (2000); Schirer, William, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1991); Tobias, Fritz, The Reichstag Fire (1964).

A communist Dutchman, Marinus van der Lubbe, was sentenced to death for treason and arson in 1933 for setting fire to the parliament building four weeks after Adolf Hitler became chancellor. Historians still debate whether van der Lubbe acted alone or if the Nazis were involved in the crime.

“The Reichstag fire is a stigma of German history,” Pau, a member of the Left Party that’s a successor to former East Germany’s ruling communists, said in a speech in Berlin on Feb. 26. “The Bundestag especially should have a particular interest in this and push for a clarification.”


Court Overturns Nazi Verdict on Reichstag Arsonist
Germany’s federal prosecutor has overturned the guilty verdict passed on Marinus van der Lubbe, the communist activist who claimed to have set fire to the Reichstag in 1933 to protest the Nazis’ rising power.

The Nazis used the blaze as a pretext to persecute the opposition and suspend civil rights, saying the fire was the start of a communist revolution. Pau said the review of the fire should be undertaken by scientists, such as fire experts, and historians.  >>>MORE<<<

A lot of what’s listed below sounds a lot like what has  been going on and it’s not by National Socialists. shera~
Recognise this? what happens when this becomes GLOBAL?
Dictionaries tell us that fascism involves, “Extreme right-wing, nationalist and authoritarian systems of government and social organisation.” Almost everyone recognises the past regimes of Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini as totalitarian. However, few citizens of the US, Britain, or Australia, consider that their governments have yet reached such extremes.
Dr Laurence Britt has studied the characteristics of past regimes such as, “Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Franco’s Spain, Salazar’s Portugal, Papadopoulos’s Greece, Pinochet’s Chile, and Suharto’s Indonesia.”

He lists fourteen common themes.

* 1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. (Prominent use of flags and slogans. Pride in the military, and international sports successes.)2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. (The people are persuaded to accept the regime’s abuse of its victims. Such as wide and intrusive surveillance, detention without legal access, extreme interrogation methods, the internment and traumatising of children, etc.) 
* 3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. (The use of propaganda and disinformation to divert the people’s attention from other problems, and to channel fear and frustration in controlled directions. Active opponents of these regimes are inevitably labelled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.ngly.)

* 4. Supremacy of the military / Avid militarism. (The military is seen as an expression of nationalism, and is used to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the state, and those who control it.)* 5. Rampant Sexism (The political elite and the national culture are male-dominated. Abortion and homosexuality are suppressed. The state is represented as the guardian of moral values. Sexual smears are propagated against opponents of both genders. There is a phobia surrounding alleged sexual abuse or misconduct, in both the media and the courts.)* 6. Controlled Mass Media. (The media is either directly controlled by the state, or it is regulated and indirectly controlled by media magnates who are politically attuned with the regime. In the present day, the media includes the Internet, and censorship and controls also apply there.)
* 7. Obsession with national security. 

Short URL:

Millions Spent In Settlements, But Who Pays For Police Misconduct?

Millions Spent In Settlements, But Who Pays For Police Misconduct?

(MintPress) — As incidents of police  and misconduct rise in cities throughout the nation, so does the price tag for the American people, who ultimately carry the cost associated with investigations, administrative leaves and million dollar. The burden to the officers themselves is often nothing more than a pink slip and, in the worst-case-scenario, loss of employment.
That’s the story right now in Jonesboro, Ark., where a mother is grieving the loss of her 21-year-old son, who police allege shot himself while he was handcuffed in the back of a squad car.
Teresa Carter told WREG, a local news station, that the shot was fired in her son’s right temple, although he was left-handed. She also claims that at some point, her son had called his girlfriend to inform her he would be calling her from jail.
“I mean, I just want to know what really happened,” she told the news station.
The story of Chavis Carter’s alleged suicide is raising the eyebrows not only of his family and community, but also within the Jonesboro Police Department, where an internal investigation has been launched. The two police officers on the scene have been placed on administrative leave.
At this time, Carter’s mother has not filed a civil , but if it comes to that and the police department offers a settlement, the money will not be taken from the officers’ pension funds or paychecks — and will instead be taken from the department’s coffers, which is made up of government-funded taxpayer dollars.
If the case is anything like a recent one in , the officers could even keep their jobs.

Who pays when police misbehave?

Ohio Revised Code 2921.29 Failure to disclose personal information.

2921.29 Failure to disclose personal information.

(A) No person who is in a public place shall refuse to disclose the person’s name, address, or date of birth, when requested by a law enforcement officer who reasonably suspects either of the following:
(1) The person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a criminal offense.
(2) The person witnessed any of the following:
(a) An offense of violence that would constitute a felony under the laws of this state;
(b) A felony offense that causes or results in, or creates a substantial risk of, serious physical harm to another person or to property;
(c) Any attempt or conspiracy to commit, or complicity in committing, any offense identified in division (A)(2)(a) or (b) of this section;
(d) Any conduct reasonably indicating that any offense identified in division (A)(2)(a) or (b) of this section or any attempt, conspiracy, or complicity described in division (A)(2)(c) of this section has been, is being, or is about to be committed.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of failure to disclose one’s personal information, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.
(C) Nothing in this section requires a person to answer any questions beyond that person’s name, address, or date of birth. Nothing in this section authorizes a law enforcement officer to arrest a person for not providing any information beyond that person’s name, address, or date of birth or for refusing to describe the offense observed.
(D) It is not a violation of this section to refuse to answer a question that would reveal a person’s age or date of birth if age is an element of the crime that the person is suspected of committing.
Effective Date: 04-14-2006

Key disclosure law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Key disclosure laws, also known as mandatory key disclosure, is legislation that require individuals to surrendercryptographic keys to law enforcement. The purpose is to allow access to material for confiscation or digital forensicspurposes and use it either as evidence in a court of law or to enforce national security interests. Similarly, mandatory decryption laws force owners of encrypted data to supply decrypted data to law enforcement.
Nations vary widely in the specifics of how they implement key disclosure laws. Some, such as Australia, give law enforcement wide-ranging power to compel assistance in decrypting data from any party. Some, such as Belgium, concerned with self-incrimination, only allow law enforcement to compel assistance from non-suspects. Some require only specific third parties such as telecommunications carriers, certification providers, or maintainers of encryption services to provide assistance with decryption. In all cases, a warrant is generally required.

Theory and countermeasures

Mandatory decryption is technically a weaker requirement than key disclosure, since it is possible in some cryptosystems to prove that a message has been decrypted correctly without revealing the key. For example, using RSA public-key encryption, one can verify given the message (plaintext), the encrypted message (ciphertext), and the public key of the recipient that the message is correct by merely re-encrypting it and comparing the result to the encrypted message. Such a scheme is called undeniable, since once the government has validated the message they cannot deny that it is the correct decrypted message.[1]
As a countermeasure to key disclosure laws, some personal privacy products such as BestCryptFreeOTFE, andTrueCrypt have begun incorporating deniable encryption technology, which enable a single piece of encrypted data to be decrypted in two or more different ways, creating plausible deniability.[2][3] Another alternative is steganography, which hides encrypted data inside of benign data so that it is more difficult to identify in the first place.
A problematic aspect of key disclosure is that it leads to a total compromise of all data encrypted using that key in the past or future; time-limited encryption schemes such as those of Desmedt et al.[1] allow decryption only for a limited time period.

Pro Gun Control Candidate; Robin Kelly Wins Primary for Jessie Jackson Jr Seat.

CHICAGO — Riding a wave of “super PAC” spending that helped catapult her to the front of a crowded Democratic field, Robin Kelly, whose campaign called for tougher national gun laws, clinched her party’s nomination Tuesday in a special primary election for the House seat vacated by Representative Jesse L. Jackson Jr.
The outcome of the contest, which had been unexpectedly cast into the center of the national gun debate, was welcome news for Michael R. Bloomberg, the mayor of New York and a staunch gun-control advocate. He poured more than $2.2 million into attacking Ms. Kelly’s chief opponent, Debbie Halvorson, this month.

Flooding Chicago airwaves, Mr. Bloomberg’s super PAC, Independence USA, ran a series of advertisements criticizing Ms. Halvorson for opposing certain gun control measures and endorsing Ms. Kelly as the alternative candidate.
The advertising campaign, a huge amount for a single House race, set up Ms. Halvorson’s defeat on Tuesday as a shot across the bow to other Democrats supporting gun rights, a sign of what could await future candidates who do not align with Mr. Bloomberg’s quest to change firearm laws across the country.

Will ’95,000 gallons of drill water mixed with fresh water’ from West Virginia Fracking Spill Impact Ohio River? »

A large amount of water used in fracking a natural gas and oil well spilled in rural West Virginia.
The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection had inspectors on the scene southeast of Wheeling in Marshall County, near the small town of Dallas over the weekend.
Nearly 100,000 gallons leaked from a pit used to store fracking waste outside Wheeling, and the bulk of it flowed downhill into a nearby creek.
“Right now, there is not an alarming level of concern. Certainly, it is not materials we want flowing freely in the environment,” said Kathy Cosco, of the West Virginia Department of West Virginia.
The department said that 95,000 gallons of drill water mixed with fresh water poured out of an open valve down a hill, then into a tributary of Big Wheeling Creek.
“Fortunately, we have found no evidence of any fish kill or any aquatic life being affected by this spill, so that is good news,” Cosco said.
The department has taken water and soil samples and testing is underway.
The drilling company Noble Energy said, “We do not believe that any creeks, streams or surrounding landowners have been significantly impacted.”
A local university professor said the Big Wheeling Creek feeds into the Ohio River, which is a source of drinking water for millions of people.
When asked if there will be an impact to water intake, Wheeling Jesuit University Professor Ben Stout said, “I don’t think so, but I am glad the Wheeling water intake is upstream from Wheeling Creek.”
Stout said that if there was hydrochloric acid in the spill, it could have a long-term impact on the stream.

“There are events that occur and they are going to occur more frequently with more industrial activity,” Stout said.
Noble Energy released the following statement to NBC4:
“At approximately 8:20 p.m. on Friday, February 22, 2013, Noble Energy became aware that its SHL-3 centralized pit was overflowing at its water storage site.  Noble Energy employees responded immediately and found a valve was open, feeding the pit with freshwater.  Employees resolved the issue by closing the valve and stopping the flow.   A root cause analysis is being conducted to determine why the valve was open and Noble Energy will adopt protocols to prevent such occurrence in the future.  >>>MORE<<<

Australian Muslim activists lose free speech case

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Two Muslim activists accused of sending offensive letters to families of Australian soldiers killed in Afghanistan narrowly lost a court appeal Wednesday that cited their constitutional freedom of speech.
HE TOLD them their sons were killers and murderers. But outside court yesterday the self-styled Muslim cleric, Man Haron Monis, claimed letters he sent to the grieving families of Australia’s fallen diggers were his own version of a ”flower basket” or ”condolence card”.
Private Luke Worsley Killed in action on 23 November , 2007
Aged 26
Mr Monis, also known as Sheikh Haron, has been charged with seven counts of using a postal service to menace, harass or cause offence when he sent a series of letters to the families of Private Luke Worsley and Lance Corporal Jason Marks, who were killed in Afghanistan in 2007 and last year.
Lance Corporal Jason Marks Killed in action on 27 April , 2008
Aged 27
Mr Monis, of Campsie, is also charged over a letter he sent in July to the family of the Australian Trade official, Craig Senger, who was killed in the bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta in 2007.
It is understood Mr Monis sent letters to other families of dead soldiers, for which he has not been charged.
photos of fallen soldiers taken from Memorial Page Military Brotherhood MMC   
During his appearance at the Downing Centre Local Court yesterday, his lawyer, Chris Murphy, said his client was a ”peace activist” whose letters had contained no threats.more: 
Iranian-born Man Horan Monis, a self-styled Sydney cleric also known as Sheik Haron, was charged in 2009 with 12 counts of using as postal service in an offensive way and one count of using a postal service in a harassing way. Amirah Droudis was charged with aiding and abetting the offences.
The six judges of the High Court split on whether the charges were compatible with Australians’ right to free speech.Read more: 

WOW: GUILTY! – Final Verdict is Rendered in First Common Law Court Case against the Vatican and Canada for Genocide

This was sent to me in an email by Snowy Smith, I couldn't believe my eyes, so I did a little more searching online and here you have it folks……
I guess this explains why he stepped down?

Final Verdict is Rendered in First Common Law Court Case against the Vatican and Canada for Genocide

Pope, Queen and Canadian Prime Minister found Guilty of Crimes against Humanity and Sentenced to Twenty Five Year Prison Terms

I guess we know why The Pope resigned?


Subject: !!!BREAKING NEWS!!!

[5:08:54 AM] Kevin Annett: Breaking Historic News: Monday, February 25, 2013                      
Final Verdict is Rendered in First Common Law Court Case against the Vatican and Canada for Genocide
Pope, Queen and Canadian Prime Minister found Guilty of Crimes against Humanity and Sentenced to Twenty Five Year Prison Terms -
Court Orders them to Surrender by March 4 or face Citizens' Arrests
Pope Benedict will go to jail for twenty five years for his role in Crimes against Humanity, and Vatican wealth and property is to be seized, according to today's historic verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice.
The Brussels-based Court handed down a unanimous guilty verdict from its Citizen Jurors and ordered the citizens' arrest of thirty Defendants commencing March 4 in a Court Order issued to them today.
The verdict read in part,
"We the Citizen Jury find that the Defendants in this case are guilty of the two indictments, that is, they are guilty of committing or aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, and of being part of an ongoing Criminal Conspiracy"
The Jury ruled that each Defendant receive a mandatory twenty five year prison sentence without parole, and have all their personal assets seized.
The Court went on to declare in its Order No. 022513-001,
"The Defendants are ordered to surrender themselves voluntarily to Peace Officers and Agents authorized by this COURT, having been found Guilty as charged.
"The Defendants have seven days from the issuing of this ORDER, until March 4, 2103, to comply. After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants".
The guilty parties include Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England, Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada, and the head officers of the Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada. (A complete copy of the Verdict, the Court Order and a list of the Defendants is enclosed on the accompanying you tube link).
The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors. (, November 6 and January 30 postings)
These exhibits detailed irrefutable proof of a massive criminal conspiracy by the Defendants' institutions to commit and conceal Genocide on generations of children in so-called Indian residential schools across Canada.
None of the Defendants challenged or disputed a Public Summons issued to them last September; nor did they deny the charges made against them, or offer counter evidence to the Court.
"Their silence told me a lot. Why wouldn't innocent people defend their own reputation when accused of such horrible things?" commented one Juror, based in England.
"These crimes were aimed at children, and were a cold and calculated plan to wipe out Indians who weren't Christians. And the defendants clearly are still covering up this crime. So we felt we had to do more than slap their wrist. The whole reign of terror by state-backed churches that are above the law has to end, because children still suffer from it".
The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.
To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children.
"This sentence gives a legal foundation and legitimacy to the church occupations that have already begun by victims of church torture around the world" commented Kevin Annett, the chief adviser to the Prosecutor's Office, who presented its case to the world.
"The verdict of the Court is clearly that these criminal church bodies are to be legally and practically disestablished, and their stolen wealth reclaimed by the people. Justice has finally begun to be be served. The dead can now rest more easily."
Court officers are delivering the Order to all the Defendants this week, including to the Canadian Prime Minister, the Queen of England and to Joseph Ratzinger, the retiring Pope Benedict who is avoiding arrest within the Vatican after suddenly resigning two weeks ago.
The citizens' arrests of these and other Defendants will commence on March 4 if they do not surrender themselves and their assets, as per the Court Order.
These actions will be filmed and posted in the coming week, along with further updates from the Court and its Citizen Agents.
Please see the accompanying you tube video.
Issued by the Central Office, The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State
25 February, 2013

From: Tom Murphy []
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:10 PM
Subject: !!! It is Official!!! Plus Verified Declaration of Incompetence against DA Dudley - Enjoy
Importance: High
To All: 
It is official!  The National Standards Enforcement Agency / Authority is aligned as a “founding organization” with The International Common Law Court of Justice.  The ICLCOJ’s “venue” is international, no boundaries.  It’s “Jurisdiction” is final.
See Skype communication:
History and Legal Basis of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) - and its affiliate, The International Common Law Court of Justice
The ITCCS is a citizen-based "Tribunal of Conscience" with standing under international and natural law. Its legitimacy is established under the international legal principle of a Necessity Act under which citizens can establish a bona fide judicial mechanism rooted in the Common Law.
Founded in the spring of 2010 at a conference of survivors of church torture in Dublin, Ireland, the ITCCS presently comprises organizations in fifteen countries (see list of founding sponsors and affiliates below). It was founded because of the refusal of existing courts and governments to charge and prosecute churches guilty of genocide and crimes against children, and because of the active complicity of these state agencies with such criminal church bodies.
The ITCCS Central Office is in Brussels, Belgium, with affiliate centers in London, Dublin, Rome, New York and Vancouver.
The Acting Field secretary of the ITCCS is Rev. Kevin D. Annett, M.A., M.Div. Its legal advisers include members of the Kuala Lampur Human Rights Tribunal, Andrew Paterson, a common law expert, members of the American and Canadian Bar Associations, and lawyers with the prestigious Center for Constitutional Rights in New York City.
The two fold purpose of the ITCCS is 1. To bring to trial those persons and institutions responsible for the exploitation, torture and murder of children, past and present, and 2. To stop these and other criminal actions by churches, corporations and governments.
A complete description of the philosophy and basis of the ITCCS is available at itccs.orgunder the subtitle "About", on its lead page.
In the fall of 2012, in conjunction with lawyers and politicians in Europe and America, the ITCCS established a de jure International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) to place on trial institutions and their officers responsible for crimes against humanity and children.
Comprised of sworn Citizen Jurors, a panel of legally-trained trial judges, and a Citizen Prosecutor's Office, the ICLCJ has concluded its first case in its docket - in the matter of Genocide in Canada by church and state. Its complete evidence is available online , under the postings dated November 6, 2012 and January 30, 2013.
The verdict of the Court concerning the defendants in this case - who include the Queen of England, the Pontiff of the Church of Rome and the Prime Minister of Canada - will be posted at The enforcement of the final verdict will be placed in the hands of the Court's Sheriff's Office and its force of sworn Common Law Peace Officers.
Upcoming cases in the docket of the ICLCJ will include the complicity of the Vatican and other churches with pharmaceutical companies in crimes against humanity; the historical persecution and religious genocide perpetrated against the Huguenot and other Protestant communities by the Church of Rome; the concealment of Genocide by Canadian church and state; and specific cases of Genocide committed under religious sanction and supervision in Ireland, America and other nations.
The ITCCS is the precursor of a new wave of citizen-based justice aimed at empowering citizens everywhere to defend their liberties, their children, and their lands in the face of unaccountable and destructive corporate forces.
For more information . Local ITCCS affiliates are listed below, or separately.
The ITCCS has affiliate organizations or individual members in the following fifteen countries as of 15 February, 2013:
United States
South Africa
Its founding organizations include:
    Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared (Canada)
    Templemore Forgotten Victims Group (Antrim, Ireland)
    Akha Heritage Foundation (Thailand)
    Survivors of Clergy Abuse (Australia)
    SAPED (Canada)
    Republican Party of Kanata
    The National Standards Enforcement Agency (NSEA) - America
    Cultural Foundation Native Expressions (Canada)
    Against Church Terror (ACT) – (United States)
    Friends of ITCCS - Ireland
[2/21/2013 2:43:27 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: Hi Kevin, I am in Riverside and am available.  Did you wish to call me on skype?  My cell signal is not so good here.
[2/21/2013 3:44:32 PM] *** Call to Kevin Annett, no answer. ***
[2/21/2013 3:45:40 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: Kevin, we are going to go get something to eat.  Will be back in about an hour.  I will call again when we return.
[2/21/2013 4:11:32 PM] Kevin Annett: Update from ITCCS and Kevin Annett: The Common Law Court will publicly post its Verdict and the Sentence concerning the Pope and other Defendants, and will issue a Court Order, at 9 am Rome Time this Monday, February 25 (8 am GMT). Please post the Verdict and press/video announcement as widely as you can on that day; it will be on youtube at that time. Thank you and please translate this announcement.
[2/22/2013 10:42:11 PM] Kevin Annett: Dear friends : Great things are happening! Help us NOW to strike another blow at the tottering and blood-soaked Vatican by standing ready this Monday morning, February 25, to receive and post everywhere our historic Common Law Court verdict on Genocide by church and state in Canada: at At 8 am EST, 1 pm Greenwich Time, We will send you the exclusive news story in a media release and a you tube video posting with the Court Verdict, Sentence and Court Order to the defendants, who include the Pope, the Queen of England and the Canadian Prime Minister. Thank you and carry this on!
[10:35:42 PM] Kevin Annett: (please translate this piece)
[4:11:42 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: Very good!
[4:15:18 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: Hi Kevin, I have been out of touch for two days.  I am back in the saddle now.  Please let me know when you will be available to talk.  Looking forward to the posting on Monday......
[4:19:29 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: PS. Kevin, please change the (USA) behind NSEA to (America), Thank you.
[4:24:40 PM] Kevin Annett: ok
[4:27:14 PM] Dee Thomas Murphy: Thank you
3 attachments — Download all attachments  
418K   View   Download  
94K   View   Download  
25K   View   Download  

thank you Snowy Smith