Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Conn. taps into European Immigration and the Industrial Revolutions past to promote tourism


HARTFORD, Conn. — More than a century after waves of Europe’s working class left for jobs in New England mills and other prospects in the U.S., their homes, communities and traditions are providing fresh opportunities to promote tourism in Connecticut.
Connecticut’s population history is by no means unique; nevertheless it is startling to note the changes which have occurred in the make-up of the state’s citizenry in a century and a half. In the early nineteenth century, most of the state’s residents were of English birth or descent and were overwhelmingly Protestant. By 1910, nearly thirty percent of the population was foreign-born, and of that group, roughly fifty-five percent were from Southern and Eastern Europe. Seventeen percent alone were born in Italy. In 1980, 1,259,873 of Connecticut’s residents claimed ancestry from one of fifteen European nationalities. Persons of English and Scotch descent combined accounted for only 17.9 percent of the group. Nearly 1,700,000 more inhabitants claim descent from one of six mixed-European nationality groups. In addition, over 124,000 persons of Spanish origin and almost 19,000 residents of Asian and Pacific Island background live in Connecticut. Such a profound demographic transformation is of crucial significance for Connecticut’s teachers. Their students are the descendants of this diverse population growth.
The homogeneity and stability of Connecticut’s population in the Colonial and Early National Periods can be exaggerated. Connecticut’s population constantly received new immigrant infusions from England in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. And ethnic homogeneity did not preclude religious diversity. By 1770, the state’s Protestant churches included Congregational. Episcopal, Baptist, Presbyterian, and Lutheran congregations. Most Protestant dissenting sects were excused from attendance at Congregational services. But the dominance of the legendary Yankee of English stock is no myth. It has been estimated that at the time of the American Revolution over ninety-six percent of Connecticut’s population was either English-born or of English descent.
Irish, Italian, Lithuanian, French Canadian, Polish and other immigrants labored in factories that made silk in Manchester, thread in Willimantic, hats in Danbury and numerous other Connecticut mill towns in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Economic development officials now want to tell the immigrants’ stories to draw tourists.

Irish and German Immigration

Anti-Irish sentiment permeated the United States during the Industrial Revolution. The prejudice exhibited in advertisements like this one sometimes led to violent outbursts.
In the middle half of the nineteenth century, more than one-half of the population of IRELAND emigrated to the United States. So did an equal number of GERMANS. Most of them came because of civil unrest, severe unemployment or almost inconceivable hardships at home. This wave of immigration affected almost every city and almost every person in America. From 1820 to 1870, over seven and a half million immigrants came to the United States —
In Ireland almost half of the population lived on farms that produced little income. Because of their poverty, most Irish people depended on potatoes for food. When this crop failed three years in succession, it led to a great FAMINE with horrendous consequences. Over 750,000 people starved to death.
Initially costing $100,000, the project stems from an emerging marketing strategy known as cultural or ethnic tourism. With more than 100 heritage or cultural organizations, Connecticut has a strong base of support to launch a cultural tourism initiative, said Kip Bergstrom, deputy economic development commissioner.
Bergstrom said other Northeast states can similarly boast a history of ethnic and national groups, but Connecticut’s small size gives visitors the chance to see much in a compact state.
“We have the whole world represented in Connecticut,” he said
As states compete fiercely for tourist dollars, marketing officials are looking for any angle to promote their communities. In Connecticut, tourism generates about $11.5 billion in spending, $1.15 billion in state and local tax revenue and employs nearly 111,000 workers, according to 2011 statistics, the most recent.
Two phases are planned for Connecticut’s project. The first, which will extend through mid-June 2013, will document the historical links between people of various ethnic communities and their neighborhoods, buildings, shops and other sites.
The second phase will use the stories that have been developed to market communities in materials ranging from brochures to smartphone apps.
Mary Donohue, executive director of the Manchester Historical Society, said historic preservationists in Connecticut have worked with scholars to identify African-American historic sites and partnered with the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Hartford to identify historic synagogues, provide tours and highlight Jewish-owned farms and resorts. more from CBS

“END INTERNET PRIVACY BILL” PASSES HOUSE! and WHO’S REALLY BEHIND INTERNET TAKEOVER BILL CISPA?



By Rev. Ted Pike
27 Apr 12

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, HR 3523, passed the House of Representatives Thursday, 248 to 168. Sponsored by Republican Mike Rogers, head of the House Intelligence Committee, it was favored by 206 “anti-terrorist” Republicans, cancelling promised Republican leverage for freedom in the House.
CISPA grants special security clearances to the largest Jewish-owned internet providers, such as Verizon, Comcast, Google, and Facebook, to report to the government anything they perceive as a security threat. I have written about how such Jewish internet moguls as Verizon’s Ivan Seidenberg and Comcast’s Brian Roberts are ideologically allied with Zionism, receiving awards from ADL and Jewish “tolerance groups.” They fraternize with the likes of the Edgar Bronfman and Sumner Redstone, Jewish owner of Viacom/CBS. (See Threats to a Free Internet) Yet this bill would give them top-secret security clearances to know whom the government considers a “domestic terrorist” or a threat to “homeland security.” They would also be given privileges to report those they (according to their pro-ADL/Zionist suspicions) consider “threatening.”
We know very well that the ADL/Zionist lobby considers all on the political/religious right, and especially theanti-Zionist right, to be not only “haters” but also potential “conspirators.” This was proven several years ago by ADL’s broadside attack on the religious right, saying millions of Americans are “conspirators.” (See ADL Blasts ‘Paranoid’ Right: Are Millions of Anti-Obama Protestors ‘Conspirators?’)
One of the greatest threats to the Zionist/ADL agenda today is a free internet, where many hundreds of anti-Zionist websites flourish unrestrained. This bill, if passed by the Senate and approved by the President, is “dream legislation” for Jewish supremacists, giving ADL and Sen. Lieberman’s Senate Homeland Security Committee supervisory privileges over “hate” sites and all who visit them.
It is vital now that you do the following to save internet freedom:

WHO’S REALLY BEHIND INTERNET TAKEOVER BILL CISPA?

By Rev. Ted Pike
7 May 12

Most of the western world would be happy to enjoy a free internet forever. It is a privilege longed for by citizens in China and Iran. But one group—Jewish, Zionist supremacists—are not happy about it. The internet spreads information they want secret: the anti-Gentile, anti-Christian teachings of the Talmud, and the fact of immense, disproportionate Jewish power in finance, government and media.
Zionists particularly resent the power of the internet to broadcast Israel’s latest injustices against Palestinians. Thousands of “anti-Semitic hate sites,” right and left, have proliferated on the information superhighway. They shout that Israel is a racist apartheid state with no regard for Palestinian human and territorial rights.
It is not hard to understand why a top priority of Israel’s PR rep, the Anti-Defamation League, has been to end free speech online. It tirelessly urges governments that the internet can be just as free without “anti-Semitic hate speech.” Yet ADL has had a difficult time accomplishing this. 
In 2004 ADL created the International Network Against CyberHate. INACH’s mission was to work with governments worldwide to outlaw online criticism of Jews and Israel. ADL recommends massive “educational” programs. But there is a problem: The more people know become about Israel’s brutality toward the Palestinians and Jewish domination of western societies, the more “anti-Semitic” the world becomes! 
Unlike Jewish-dominated ACLU, ADL has not declared its position on internet control bills such as PIPA, SOPA, or CISPA. Its “neutrality” means ADL, as an “unbiased” NGO, can eventually advise the government in enforcement of these bills. If CISPA passes, the Department of Homeland Security, counseled by ADL, will surely advise CISPA informants—Jewish internet giants such as Verizon, Facebook, Time Warner Cable (all supporting CISPA)—that websites critical of Israel are anti-Semitic and even likely to sympathize with Arab terrorists! Considered seditious in America’s “war on terror,” these sites will be especially monitored and visitors reported to the government. The government may well advertise that visitors to these sites will have their names and other confidential information added to a federal “anti-terrorist” databank. Perhaps a pop-up will block visitors each time they browse the site, requiring them to opt-in to this federal databank and ominously reminding them that Big Brother is watching them.

thank you NSRevolution

Terror trial defense lawyers criticize military tribunal process as Chicago lawyer wears Muslim garb while defending Gitmo 5 client.


9/11 trial begins at Guantanamo with protest

by defendants

U.S. NAVAL BASE GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba — The arraignment of accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four top Al Qaeda lieutenants opened Saturday in a heavily guarded island courtroom with the so-called “Gitmo 5″” launching a silent protest, refusing to cooperate, listen to translations or even answer fundamental questions about a process that could end their lives.
The long-awaited trial began with defense lawyers speaking for the alleged terrorists and arguing that the protest was over their clients’ anger about alleged CIA torture and mistreatment at the prison on the southern rim of Cuba.
One of the lawyers, a woman wrapped in a black Islamic abaya, warned the judge that the protest represented the detainees’ response to “these past eight years” and demonstrated their refusal to acknowledge American military law.
“What happened to these men has affected their ability to focus on these proceedings,” said civilian attorney Cheryl Borman.
But Judge James Pohl, an Army colonel from Pepperdine University presiding in a high-backed chair with the seals of the U.S. Armed Forces on the wall behind him, pushed forward. He repeatedly insisted he would not allow the detainees, their protest or their silence to hijack the proceedings.
“He can participate or not, that’s his choice,” the judge said, referring to Mohammed.
Defense attorney David Nevin, left, is captured speaking with his client Khalid Sheik Mohammed,
GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba — The defense team forKhalid Shaikh Mohammed, now formally charged with capital murder in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, on Sunday angrily called the military commission legal process a political “regime” set up to put him and the four other defendants to death.
David Nevin, Mohammed’s civilian attorney, said new rules imposed under the Obama administration bar them from discussing with their clients whether they were mistreated by U.S. authorities — and in the case of Mohammed, “tortured” — after their arrests eight years ago.
“We are operating under a regime here,” Nevin said. “We are forbidden from talking to our clients about very important matters.
“And now the government wants to kill Mr. Mohammed. They want to extinguish the last eyewitness so he can never talk about his torture. They want the political cover so he’ll be convicted and executed.”
According to CIA accounts and other documents, Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, was subjected 183 times to waterboarding at a classified CIA black site before he was moved to the detainee prison at Guantanamo Bay.
On Saturday he and his four alleged Sept. 11 comrades were formally arraigned on conspiracy, terrorism and murder charges.
On the accusation that prosecutors are purposely seeking the death penalty, the brigadier general said their goal is simply to submit the case to a jury of 12 U.S. military service members.
“That’s what we want,” he said. “That’s justice, I believe. It will be a real jury, and we will trust this thing with them. These people will be impartial, and that’s what’s going to happen.”
He added, “This death penalty stuff is premature. We are trying to put this through the process.”
Martins also defended women on his prosecution team who he said were dressed “appropriately” at the arraignment Saturday. He was responding to complaints from Cheryl Bormann, a Chicago defense attorney for Walid bin Attash who wore a long black abaya to court.
On Sunday, Bormann explained her abaya, saying her client is offended by women who do not dress in conservative Islamic attire, feeling that it causes him to sin. “It is distracting to him to see a woman who has anything bare other than her face,” she said.
She added that she has met with her client a dozen times, and always dresses respectfully. “He is that conservative,” she said.

Chicago lawyer wears Muslim garb while

defending Gitmo 5 client

Attorney Cheryl Bormann is no stranger to defending unpopular clients. She spent several years with the Cook County public defender’s office supervising lawyers handling death penalty trials. Then she joined a state office that provided assistance to attorneys in death penalty cases across Illinois.
Now Bormann is defending Walid bin Attash, one of five top al-Qaidaoperatives on trial in Guantanamo Bay for allegedly conspiring in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The five men, who have come to be known collectively as the Gitmo 5, were arraigned there Saturday.
It was then that Bormann gained national notice, and a measure of criticism, for appearing in court in traditional Muslim clothing that left only her face showing and for asking one woman on the government team to consider dressing more modestly so her client could focus on the proceedings.
Bormann would not discuss reports of threats against her.