"Our Weapon Is The Truth": But Mr President ‘Why Do People Hate You?’

"Our Weapon Is The Truth": But Mr President ‘Why Do People Hate You?’

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/15/little-boy-asks-barack-obama-why-do-people-hate-you/?icid=main|aim|dl1|link2|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politicsdaily.com%2F2009%2F10%2F15%2Flittle-boy-asks-barack-obama-why-do-people-hate-you%2F

But Mr President ‘Why Do People Hate You?’

I don’t know if I want to laugh or cry from laughter at Obama’s response. It sounds like I’m listening to a Feminine Hygiene Commercial.

I picture the mom and daughter sitting somewhere and the daughter asks ‘Mom, what do you do when you have that not so fresh feeling’


“The crowd clapped for Tyren as Obama laughed and patted Tyren on the shoulder.”

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal attended, as did Sen. Mary Landrieu, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, and Tyren Scott, a 4th-grade boy who asked the president the last question during the question and answer session of the program.

“Why do people hate you? And why, aren’t they supposed to love you, if God is love?” Tyren asked the commander-in-chief.

The crowd clapped for Tyren as Obama laughed and patted Tyren on the shoulder.

“First of all, I did get elected president, so not everybody hates me; I got a whole lot of votes,” Obama joked. “A lot of it is what’s called politics, where once one party wins, the other party feels like they’ve got to poke you a little bit to keep you on your toes. So you shouldn’t take it too seriously.” He went on. “But people are worried about their own lives. A lot of people are losing their jobs right now. They’re losing their health care or they lost their homes to foreclosure and they’re feeling frustrated, and when you’re president of the United States, you’ve got to deal with all of it. You get some of the credit when things are going good, but when things are going bad, you get some of the blame.”

“But that’s all right,” Obama said, adding, “I’m a pretty tough guy. Are you a tough guy? You look pretty tough. So you’ve just got to keep going on going, even when folks are criticizing you, when you know you’re doing it for other people.”

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/15/little-boy-asks-barack-obama-why-do-people-hate-you/?icid=main|aim|dl1|link2|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politicsdaily.com%2F2009%2F10%2F15%2Flittle-boy-asks-barack-obama-why-do-people-hate-you%2F

Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes

According to law, the State of Hawaii must now disclose how it came to the decision that is found in Director Fukino’s July 27th Press Release that was approved by the State’s Attorney General. Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-4 states very clearly that formal opinions of the Attorney General must be made public. Further, the Hawaiian Office of Information Practices in 1991 formally set out the requirements that informal opinions of the AG must also be made available for public inspection. According to Donofrio, under the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Rule 510): “when the conclusions of an informal Attorney General opinion are made public by the agency/client, then the accompanying record of that opinion must also be disclosed to the public:”
The State of Hawaii declared that Obama was a Natural Born Citizen and that this disclosure was approved by the Attorney General of the State. The State of Hawaii must now release any and all communications and documentation that led it to making this determination. Because Janice Okubo on July 29th revealed that the decision was approved by the State’s Attorney General, and the state made its Natural Born Citizen statement, the state is now required by law to disclose how it reached that conclusion. As Donofrio explains, there can be no secret law. The State of Hawaii cannot simply make a statement with legal weight, and then when asked to provide how it reached that decision, simply say: ‘You just have to trust us on that’. They must release any and all information that led them to make their public declarations.
On October 5th, Donofrio wrote to the office of the Attorney General, contacting Jill Nagamine: Read More

Obama's Achilles heel - Natural Born Citizenship

What is a Natural Born Citizen?

For well over a year now, we have been hearing this question in regards to Barack Obama. It’s a good question, and one that is relevant only when discussing the President, Vice President, and anyone else who may assume the Presidency in the line of succession. This the only time that such a distinction matters.It will help in this very important discussion to understand the differing types of Citizenship that the United States recognizes and what defines them.
A Naturalized Citizen is one who has applied for and has qualified for American Citizenship. Someone applying for and being granted US Citizenship must meet the following qualifications according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website.
To be eligible for Naturalization one must:

• Be at least 18 years old at the time of filing the Application for Naturalization, Form N-400

• Have been lawfully admitted to the United States

• Have resided as a permanent resident in the United States for at least 5 years or 3 years if you meet all eligibility requirements to file as a spouse of a U.S. citizen

• Have demonstrated continuous permanent residence

• Have demonstrated physical presence• Have lived for 3 months in the USCIS district or state where the Application for Naturalization, Form N-400 is filed

• Demonstrate good moral character• Show an attachment to the U.S. Constitution

• Be able to read, write, speak, and understand basic English• Demonstrate a knowledge of U.S. civics (history and government)

• Take the oath of allegiance to the United States

The next type of citizen is that of a standard citizen. The USICS website describes a citizen thusly:
“A citizen of the United States is a native-born, foreign-born, or naturalized person who owes allegiance to the United States and who is entitled to its protection. In addition to the naturalization process, the United States recognizes the U.S. citizenship of individuals according to two fundamental principles: jus soli, or right of birthplace, and jus sanguinis, or right of blood (deriving citizenship through parent’s citizenship). Whether someone born outside the U.S. to a U.S. citizen parent is a U.S. citizen depends on the law in effect when the person was born. These laws have changed over the years, but usually require a combination of at least one parent being a U.S. citizen when the child was born and having lived in the U.S. or its possessions for a period of time” More Here

What do you mean you need my status? I'm insulted

I'd love to thank Republican Sens. David Vitter of Louisiana and Bob Bennett of Utah, for asking this, I only hope more will follow their leads.
I find this to be very disturbing. Here is the Government once again bowing down to appease 'Illegal Immigrants' because some alphabet group and or church group is crying, threatening with you won't get our votes and to top it off guess what you just earned your self the title 'RACIST'. Call me Racist because there is nothing at all wrong with asking a question and being proud and standing with your race. They(Mexicans,Africans, and every other group) do it all the time.
I think there is nothing at all wrong with asking ones legal status. Why are we rewarding Illegals once again,with another privilege. What getting subsidies galore isn't good enough, and taking our jobs the Government claims no one wants. It's now insulting to ask someones 'Status' because they fear being here illegally. . . I think it's not only the right of the Government to know the correct status of residents but also the Tax Paying, Citizens of the U.S. who are supporting many of said 'Illegals' through the US Government welfare, Social Security Income (these folks have never paid into it like many Americans who get it undeservedly. I also propose a voter recount also because how many Non-Citizens Voted? I'm not talking 'Non-Citizen' Residents only that think they have the right to vote and decide how the Government can spend our taxes while they benefit. (beautifulnightmare)


Since the first Census in 1790, the bureau has routinely asked in various surveys whether people are native-born or foreign-born, but it has never asked about legal status.


Immigrants often are the hardest to count because many mistrust government, especially if they are in the U.S. illegally. Crackdowns on illegal immigration at the border and at work sites have made outreach for next year's Census even more challenging.

Some Latino groups such as the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders are calling for immigrants to boycott the Census unless laws are changed to give those here illegally a chance to gain legal status.

"Already the public fears that the Census is too intrusive," says Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, which opposes both the amendment and the boycott.
The "Take 10" campaign promotes the idea that the Census form has only 10 questions and should take just 10 minutes to answer. Adding questions would require designing new forms. "It's operationally impossible," says Steve Jost, Census associate communications director. "The forms are printed, folded. We have bilingual forms. ... We're printing 1.5 million forms a day."

By law, the Census is taken April 1. State population counts must be submitted to the president the following Dec. 31 so that seats in the House can be apportioned.
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20091014/NEWS08/910140385/2047/BUSINESS

Proposed last week by Republican Sens. David Vitter of Louisiana and Bob Bennett of Utah, the amendment would exclude illegal immigrants from the population count used to allocate congressional seats after the 2010 Census. It also would require the Census to ask people whether they are citizens.

"Illegal aliens should not be included for the purposes of determining representation in Congress, and that's the bottom line here," Vitter says. If enacted, the amendment to an appropriations bill would stop funding of the 2010 Census unless the changes are made.
http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20091014/UPDATES01/91014024/Senators+try+to+exclude+illegal+immigrants+from+2010+Census

Schwarzenegger signs bill limiting ammunition sales.

Bowing to pressure from Mexico and the anti-gun lobby, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger last night signed Assembly Bill 962 restricting ammunition sales. Beginning February 1, 2011 retailers will be required to place all ammo behind counters and create a registry of handgun ammunition buyers by obtaining their fingerprint and recording their drivers license numbers.



In a letter to the State Assembly the Governor stated: “Utilized properly, this type of information is invaluable for keeping communities safe and preventing dangerous felons from committing crimes with firearms. Assembly Bill 962 reasonably regulates access to ammunition and improves public safety without placing undue burdens on consumers. For these reasons, I am pleased to sign this bill.”

The legislation also requires face to face transfers of ammunition which will eliminate any mail order or Internet purchases of ammunition by State residents. Retailers like Cabella’s reportedly aren't waiting for the bill to take effect and will stop shipping to CA soon.

This bill will exacerbate an already tight market in CA for ammunition and unfairly burden law abiding citizens with more hurdles to jump over to exercise their Second Amendment Rights. Schwarzenegger has been no friend to gun owners in the Golden State. Though he did veto legislation banning gun shows from public property he has in the past signed bills restricting the purchase of certain types of guns and requiring microstamping for handguns.

“As Governor, I have sought the appropriate balance between public safety and the right to keep and bear arms. I have also vetoed many pieces of legislation that sought to place unreasonable restrictions and burdens on firearms dealers and ammunition vendors.” he said.

Gulf Arabs In Secret Talks With Russia And China To Ditch US Dollar According To British Media

*Source: DTN News / Int'l Media
(NSI News Source Info) LONDON, UK - October 12, 2009: Britain's The Independent newspaper says Gulf Arab states are in secret talks with Russia, China, Japan and France to replace the US dollar with a basket of currencies in the trading of oil.
The US dollar eased after the report, written by veteran Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk and posted on The Independent's website. It cited unidentified sources in Gulf Arab states and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong.
Fisk said the proposal was for trade in crude oil to move to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.
"Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars," said the report. It added that France had also been involved in the talks.
The article said the plans may help to explain the sudden rise in the price of gold, which is commonly seen as a safe haven in troubled economic times.
The Independent said US authorities were aware that the meetings had taken place but had not discovered the details and were "sure to fight this international cabal".
The issue of shifting oil trade away from the US dollar has been raised occasionally in recent years, but analysts and experts say it is unlikely to occur any time soon.
"I don't think we will see much concrete actions coming out of such discussions because even when the dollar is weak, it doesn't mean that commodities are undervalued," said David Moore, commodities analyst at the Commonwealth Bank.
"In fact, when the dollar weakens, commodities prices tend to increase by a higher ratio."
Iran began settling most of its crude oil exports in non-dollar currencies - primarily the euro - several years ago, but the actual price for its oil is still set in dollar terms.