Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The latest Executive Order: Obama gives himself control of all communication systems in America


US President Barack Obama quietly signed his name to an Executive Order on Friday, allowing the White House to control all private communications in the country in the name of national security.
President Obama released his latest Executive Order on Friday, July 6, a 2,205-word statement offered as the “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions.” And although the president chose not to commemorate the signing with much fanfare, the powers he provides to himself and the federal government under the latest order are among the most far-reaching yet of any of his executive decisions.
Later, the president announces that the Department of Homeland Security will be tasked with drafting a plan during the next 60 days to explain how the DHS will command the government’s Emergency Telecommunications Service, as well as other telecom conduits. In order to be able to spread the White House’s message across the country, President Obama also asks for the purchasing of equipment and services that will enable such.
More from RT    thank you Bailey

Executive Order – Assignment of National Security and Emergency

Preparedness Communications Functions

EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – - – - – -
ASSIGNMENT OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1Policy. The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. Survivable, resilient, enduring, and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies, and other nations. Such communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience. The views of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and the public must inform the development of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications policies, programs, and capabilities.
Sec2Executive Office Responsibilities.
Sec2.1. Policy coordination, guidance, dispute resolution, and periodic in-progress reviews for the functions described and assigned herein shall be provided through the interagency process established in Presidential Policy Directive-1 of February 13, 2009 (Organization of the National Security Council System) (PPD-1).
(b) advise the President on the prioritization of radio spectrum and wired communications that support NS/EP functions; and
(c) have access to all appropriate information related to the test, exercise, evaluation, and readiness of the capabilities of all existing and planned NS/EP communications systems, networks, and facilities to meet all executive branch NS/EP requirements.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The information Obama does not want spreading on the internet is the existence of cheap hydrogen from plain water technology announced by the scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in April 2011. Put "say hello to cheap hydrogen" in your search engine before Obama and Chu remove the Press Release from the USDOE website. Watch youtube video "Joe Jefferis American Patriot" for historical reference.

Obama revisionists are busy.

Be sure to share this information with others.

Anonymous said...

The question no one wants to answer is whether the pending merger between Goodrich Corporation and United Technologies poses a significant risk the the security of the United States of America.

The clock is ticking. Will either candidate or any politician for that matter weigh in? Is this the perfect too big to fail merger to define each candidate's position on globalism vs USA ingenuity and innovation? Yes.

Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed
settlement during a 60-day comment period to Maribeth Petrizzi, Chief,
Litigation II Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice,450 Fifth Street, N.W., Suite 8700, Washington, D.C. 20530.

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/...

Is this combined global military industrial complex giant the place you want to trust with with a monopoly on this technology?

"LOS ALAMOS, New Mexico, April 22, 2011—Los Alamos National Laboratory
scientists have developed a way to avoid the use of expensive platinum
in hydrogen fuel cells, the environmentally friendly devices that mightreplace current power sources in everything from ersonal data devicesto automobiles."

http://www.lanl.gov/news/relea...

Both Goodrich Corporation and United Technologies have history of ITAR/Export Compliance problems (selling missile navigation crystals to the enemies of the USA in Goodrich's case). See State Department Consent Agreements for more details.